"For words, like nature, half reveal and half conceal the soul within" (Tennyson).

Thursday, May 5, 2016

And Then There Were None: A Conversation about Politics and Presidents

Below is an edited response to a question my daughter asked (via email) on April 28th. The conversation took place before Ted Cruz and John Kasich dropped out of the race, leaving Donald Trump as the presumptive nominee for the Republican Party as of May 4th. 

Q: I’m curious about your thoughts on this whole election debacle? I honestly don't even know what to think right now. Bernie Sanders appeals to me for obvious reasons but I doubt he'll get the Democratic nomination and I don't really know how I feel about Hillary and I am so horrified at the thought that TRUMP could be the Republican nominee but, even if he wasn't, I wouldn't pick Cruz. So, where do you go?

A. This morning I wrote a Letter to the Editor to the Los Angeles Times in response to an above-the-fold front page article called "GOP Gender Problem Just Got Worse." The article focused on Trump's anti-woman derisive comments about Hillary. Here's what I wrote: 
Donald Trump may have a gender problem, but the GOP does not. Donald Trump is not a Republican. He is an impostor who has hijacked the party and is taking it and the country on a nauseating joyride for his own amusement. The legitimate Republican candidate just announced as his running mate Carly Fiorina (female gender). That should have been the front page story. 
That's what I think about Trump. If he becomes the nominee, I don't vote for him. But I don't vote for Clinton either. Cruz was not my favorite (Marco Rubio was), but he's who I'll vote for. If Trump beats him to 1237, either before or during the Cleveland Convention, and becomes the GOP nominee, I hope Cruz/Fiorina run as a third party Independent ticket. Even if there are some things about him that I don't like, he is still, at his core, a principled conservative. 

Donald Trump is not a conservative. He's as big government as Clinton. Worse, he's a "strong man," a bully. Deep down, he's a liberal Democrat, no different from Clinton. So people who want a left-leaning, big government, 2016 is their year, it doesn't matter if it's Trump or Clinton. I don't think I could bear 4 or 8 years of either. My skin crawls every time I hear one of them speak. 

Sanders' appeal to you and to the younger generation and some in my generation, I find puzzling. Socialism has proven to be a failed system at best, and, at worst, a cruel and dehumanizing system. The fact that the Millennials are excited by him is not surprising since schools don't teach history anymore. But the Boomers and older should know better. A free market economy, with limited government regulation (limited, not eliminated), where innovation and entrepreneurial spirit is fostered, is what leads to a stronger economy, and yes, more opportunities for people to be employed and enter the middle class, to achieve the American dream. Government is there to protect, to provide a bona fide safety net but not cradle-to-grave security. 

I’m particularly puzzled about why young women are attracted to "big government." Women who pride themselves on independence, even to the point where they declare they don’t need a man. This new generation of feminists are so proud of their independence, but they embrace the idea of big government. What's "big government" if not, ultimately, a "daddy" or "husband" to take care of you, a la The Life of Julia? The beauty of conservatism is in its sense of self-dependence. Socialism takes all that away ("the government will take care of me and of him, no need for charity, etc.). 

The other day, I watched a fascinating interview from an old William F. Buckley, Jr. Firing Line segment. He was interviewing Margaret Thatcher before she had become Prime Minister. Most leftists despise her, but her comments and insights about socialism were very astute. She makes the case quite strongly about the harm a socialist government inflicts on individual freedoms, how people lose a sense of purpose, despite the fact that all their needs are supposedly being met by the government.

These are my core beliefs as a conservative. My thinking these days is this: conservatism is the "wine" that's stored in the "bottle" of the Republican party, which is why I'm no longer a Democrat. Once the Democratic party embraced abortion with no restrictions I changed my affiliation. But I'm not a party loyalist. If the Republican party skews left, which it will with Donald Trump at the helm, conservatism will have to find another wine bottle. You've heard the saying, "I didn't leave the Democratic party, the party left me." That will be true of me, as well as many conservatives, even if it means losing the election. 


Below are two short videos from Prager U that are relevant to the discussion about socialism. The first talks about something called The Laffer Curve, which maybe you studied in college economics (I didn't--I'm still catching up). The Laffer Curve has to do with the point at which the government actually loses money when tax rates reach a certain point. The other explains why conservatives believe government should not get too big, and addresses the problems in the European Union. 

Government: Isit Ever Big Enough? (William Voegeli, Senior Editor, Claremont Review of Books) 

Lower Taxes,Higher Revenue (Tim Groseclose, Professor of Economics, George Mason University)

No comments:

Post a Comment