"For words, like nature, half reveal and half conceal the soul within" (Tennyson).

Showing posts with label Benghazi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Benghazi. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 30, 2013

Maybe the Thrill is Gone for Chris Matthews?

Back in 2008, MSNBC anchor Chris Matthews made this "objective assessment" of Barack Obama:



Of all the left-leaning media personalities, Chris Matthews personifies, in my view, all that's wrong about journalism. One might even consider him a caricature. The fact that he could even admit on air about having a "thrill up the leg" after listening to Obama speak, and consider the statement an"objective assessment," goes beyond caricature. Matthews is the same person who told Joe Scarborough on Morning Joe, shortly after Obama was elected, "I want to do everything I can to make this thing work, this new presidency work." When Scarborough asked if that was an appropriate thing for him, as a journalist, to say, Matthews said, "Yeah, that’s my job. My job is to help this country."

Nearly six years into Obama's disastrous presidency, it appears that at least a few Obama loyalists in the media are starting to emerge from their euphoria. It's a bit of a culture shock, for instance, to listen to Chris Matthews today, throwing a few of his celebrated hardballs leftward. Here he is, asking the same kind of questions many of us on the right have been asking for over a year, regarding the terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya, on September 11, 2012: 
How come this is shrouded in mystery? What I can't understand is all these months later we're still trying to figure out what happened. I just want to know, as an American, what happened? Did everybody do what they were supposed to do? Did everybody make a really good desperate effort to save the lives of our people over there or didn't they? If they didn't, that's a problem, but I want an answer. 
Good questions. Questions that should have been asked (and not just by Republicans) from Day 1. Instead, like docile, well-trained house pets, the mainstream media compliantly accepted the Obama administration's deceptive narrative, letting both him and Hillary Clinton off the hook, and allowing the Republicans to be the "bad guys" in their attempts to get to the bottom of this story. 

I guess the thrill is gone, at least for Chris Matthews, and hopefully, for other mainstream journalists, as well. I won't say too little, too late. I will say (again), shame on those in the media who continue to lob softballs at the Obama administration. And not just about Benghazi. There are more scandals in this administration than there are journalists, it seems. Perhaps now, as the health care debacle continues to come apart at the seams, and the president's bald-faced lies get more and more scrutiny by an increasingly skeptical press, these other scandals will be re-visited more objectively.

Here's the rest of the Hardball segment, if you're interested. 

Real Clear Politics: Chris Matthews on Benghazi

Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Benghazi Hearings: Media Bias

Interesting and telling graphic. Some people will claim media bias, but which channel will they call out? 


Source: NewsBusters

Yesterday Jake Tapper said he'd be covering the hearings in depth on today's The Lead. So I turned it on to watch, only to discover that the entire hour was devoted to "breaking news" about the Jodi Arias murder trial (the verdict was due any minute!). The whole hour! I noticed Jake Tapper had tweeted earlier today that they'd be covering the Benghazi hearings today on The Lead. Obviously between the time of his tweet and the announcement that there would be a verdict in the Arias trial, plans changed. 

Curious, I replied to his tweet, and to my surprise, he replied! Here's our "conversation":


I'm sure this change of programming wasn't Tapper's first choice--some higher up probably determines what's important. And I'm guessing Tapper isn't a murder  trial junkie the way (say) Ashley Banfield apparently is. Nevertheless, the message is loud and clear: mainstream media are not planning on allowing these hearings on Benghazi to get much attention. The Los Angeles Times buried the story, while I read somewhere that The New York Times didn't even write it up. Why?  

All I can imagine is if this were about a Republican administration failing to protect its embassy on the anniversary of 9/11 and then lying for weeks about the cause of the attack, you have to bet real dollars that the major news outlets would be all over this story 24/7. But since Obama's their baby...breaking news? Nah. Nothing to see here, folks. Just politics as usual...but about that Jodi Arias trial....